Coderific

rating for Electronic Data Systems

1.0 Dismal, yet an opportunity posted on March 25, 2007

The good:

They seem to hire anyone with a bachelor's degree and a minimal csci background. This is great for someone like myself who didn't go the intern route. You can "intern" with EDS and move on, if it's right to do so.

EDS is only interested in keeping it's "top performers" (the top 25% rated by management). The rest of the people (the lower 75%) have no reason to expect any salary increase ever - unless they can get into the top 15% at some later date. This is exactly what I was told, when I pressed the issue at our training session.

Doesn't it stand to reason that a company would want to at least compensate an average, or slightly above average employee with a cost of living increase? Not so with EDS. Even the few long time top performers I talked with felt underpaid in their fields given their experience and above average performances.

If you want a shot out of school this is a good place to intern for a bit, but you better really be something special for several years if you have any aspirations of receiving an industry standard wage in the technical arena there.

The bad:

I was hired to work at the EDS El Paso solution center as a fresh CSCI grad in 2005. Their initial salary offer was 28,000$ US currency for a full time Information Analyst position. I asked why this number was so low. They told me it as based on their regional salary study of the area.

As it turns out, there weren't many CSCI jobs near El Paso EXCEPT for the positions EDS had in the nearby (~15 miles) city of Juarez, Mexico. You see EDS has a center in Juarez that pays perhaps +-23,000$ in wages. So they based our wages off this lowly skewed regional wage range.

They also bring people from Juarez, Mexico over to work in El Paso (legally), and pay them a low wage to work on lucrative US Medicaid contracts. I can only guess as to where those savings end up.

See 2 more ratings for Electronic Data Systems!

0 comments

Write a comment!
    scores in this rating

    development process

    clear requirements unrated
    design and planning unrated
    quality assurance unrated
    automated testing unrated
    peer review unrated
    development environment unrated
    development hardware unrated
    physical workspace unrated
    infrastructure and support unrated
    issue tracking unrated
    source control unrated
    product quality unrated

    culture

    cultivation of creativity unrated
    mitigation of risk unrated
    reasonable workload unrated
    prevention of crunch time unrated
    hitting deadlines unrated
    taking responsibility unrated
    development autonomy unrated
    keeping ego in check unrated

    compensation

    salary unrated
    health coverage unrated
    paid time off unrated
    snacks unrated
    other perks unrated

    organization

    advancement opportunities unrated
    employee retention unrated
    hiring process unrated
    quality of development management unrated
    quality of upper management unrated
    quality of developers unrated
    team-to-team communication unrated
    internal team communication unrated
    management-developer communication unrated

    general

    location unrated
    nearby food unrated
    business model unrated
    cool technology unrated
    vision and strategy unrated
    warm fuzzy feeling unrated
    overall 1.0

    preferences

    casual dress code unrated
    use of Free Software unrated
    development of Free Software unrated
    use of GNU/Linux unrated
    use of Mac OS unrated
    use of Solaris unrated
    use of Windows unrated
    use of BSD unrated
    use of Python unrated
    use of Perl unrated
    use of Ruby unrated
    use of Lisp unrated
    use of Java unrated
    use of C# unrated
    use of Objective-C unrated
    use of C unrated
    use of C++ unrated
    use of PHP unrated
    use of ASP unrated
    use of legacy languages unrated