| average scores for this employer | |
|---|---|
development process | |
| clear requirements | ![]() |
| design and planning | ![]() |
| quality assurance | ![]() |
| automated testing | ![]() |
| peer review | ![]() |
| development environment | ![]() |
| development hardware | ![]() |
| physical workspace |
![]()
|
| infrastructure and support | ![]() |
| issue tracking |
![]()
|
| source control |
![]() ![]()
|
| product quality | ![]() |
culture | |
| cultivation of creativity | ![]() |
| mitigation of risk | ![]() |
| reasonable workload |
![]()
|
| prevention of crunch time |
![]()
|
| hitting deadlines | ![]() |
| taking responsibility | ![]() |
| development autonomy | ![]() |
| keeping ego in check | ![]() |
compensation | |
| salary | ![]() |
| health coverage | ![]() |
| paid time off |
![]() ![]()
|
| snacks |
![]()
|
| other perks | ![]() |
organization | |
| advancement opportunities | ![]() |
| employee retention | ![]() |
| hiring process | ![]() |
| quality of development management | ![]() |
| quality of upper management | ![]() |
| quality of developers |
![]() ![]()
|
| team-to-team communication | ![]() |
| internal team communication | ![]() |
| management-developer communication | ![]() |
general | |
| location |
![]() ![]()
|
| nearby food |
![]() ![]()
|
| business model |
![]()
|
| cool technology | ![]() |
| vision and strategy | ![]() |
| warm fuzzy feeling | ![]() |
| overall | ![]() |
preferences | |
| casual dress code |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| use of Free Software |
![]() ![]()
|
| development of Free Software | unrated |
| use of GNU/Linux | unrated |
| use of Mac OS | ![]() |
| use of Solaris | ![]() |
| use of Windows |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| use of BSD | unrated |
| use of Python | unrated |
| use of Perl | unrated |
| use of Ruby | unrated |
| use of Lisp | unrated |
| use of Java |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| use of C# |
![]()
|
| use of Objective-C | unrated |
| use of C | unrated |
| use of C++ |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| use of PHP | unrated |
| use of ASP | unrated |
| use of legacy languages | unrated |
Liquent
-
average score:
- type of organization: public
- size: large (101 to 500 people)
- website: liquent.com
- development offices:
Liquent provides regulatory software products and services for the life sciences industry.
1 rating
Rate this employer!-
WORST Development By A Company
posted
on
September 15, 2006
This company gives 0-2% raises and wants people to work overtime and rewards only a few people with a pair of tickets to the movies. Wooopdeee doooo! If you're in the "club" you can get a raise otherwise forget it. Products NEVER hit the completion dates set and the product is never solid. They have the worst communication internally and foster cliques. They rarely do design and only code to use cases because that's how mgt tracks progress... Is your use case more...
