Coderific

average scores for this employer

development process

clear requirements 1.0
design and planning 1.0
quality assurance 2.0
automated testing 1.0
peer review 1.0
development environment 1.0
development hardware 2.0
physical workspace 2.0
infrastructure and support 2.0
issue tracking 2.0
source control 2.0
product quality 2.0

culture

cultivation of creativity 1.0
mitigation of risk 1.0
reasonable workload 2.0
prevention of crunch time 1.0
hitting deadlines 1.0
taking responsibility 1.0
development autonomy 1.0
keeping ego in check 1.0

compensation

salary 2.0
health coverage 2.0
paid time off 2.0
snacks 1.0
other perks 1.0

organization

advancement opportunities 1.0
employee retention 2.0
hiring process 2.0
quality of development management 1.0
quality of upper management 1.0
quality of developers 1.0
team-to-team communication 1.0
internal team communication 2.0
management-developer communication 1.0

general

location 2.0
nearby food 3.0
business model 1.0
cool technology 1.0
vision and strategy 1.0
warm fuzzy feeling 1.0
overall 1.0

preferences

casual dress code 3.0
use of Free Software 1.0
development of Free Software 1.0
use of GNU/Linux 1.0
use of Mac OS 1.0
use of Solaris 1.0
use of Windows 3.0
use of BSD unrated
use of Python 1.0
use of Perl 1.0
use of Ruby 1.0
use of Lisp 1.0
use of Java 1.0
use of C# 2.0
use of Objective-C unrated
use of C 1.0
use of C++ 2.0
use of PHP unrated
use of ASP unrated
use of legacy languages unrated
rss feed

Impac Medical Systems, Inc.

Producer of various medical software tools, relating particularly to the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Edit this employer's info!

2 ratings

Rate this employer!
  • 1.0 1 posted by javaman on June 03, 2007

    how do they attract staff?

  • 1.0 What's old is... still old. posted on September 15, 2006

    Work at Impac if...
    * you want to switch from envelopes to paper, pushing, that is;
    * you appreciate YAGNI as a principle that applies more to modern tools than to design;
    * your edges have had quite enough cutting, thank you!;
    * you believe good deeds must be punished (unless sanctioned by a committee, in which case, someone else should receive credit for the dumb do-gooder's deed;
    * you need to see what Scott Adams is always carrying on about.

discussion forum

Start a new topic! There are no posts yet in this forum.