| average scores for this employer | |
|---|---|
development process | |
| clear requirements | unrated |
| design and planning | unrated |
| quality assurance | unrated |
| automated testing | unrated |
| peer review |  |
| development environment |
|
| development hardware |
|
| physical workspace |
|
| infrastructure and support |
|
| issue tracking | unrated |
| source control |
|
| product quality |
|
culture | |
| cultivation of creativity |
|
| mitigation of risk | unrated |
| reasonable workload |
|
| prevention of crunch time |
|
| hitting deadlines |
|
| taking responsibility |
|
| development autonomy |
|
| keeping ego in check |
|
compensation | |
| salary |
|
| health coverage |
|
| paid time off |
|
| snacks |
|
| other perks |
|
organization | |
| advancement opportunities |
|
| employee retention |
|
| hiring process |
|
| quality of development management |
|
| quality of upper management |
|
| quality of developers |
|
| team-to-team communication | |
| internal team communication |
|
| management-developer communication |
|
general | |
| location |
|
| nearby food |
|
| business model | unrated |
| cool technology |
|
| vision and strategy |
|
| warm fuzzy feeling |
|
| overall | |
preferences | |
| casual dress code |
|
| use of Free Software | unrated |
| development of Free Software | unrated |
| use of GNU/Linux | unrated |
| use of Mac OS | unrated |
| use of Solaris | unrated |
| use of Windows |
|
| use of BSD | unrated |
| use of Python | unrated |
| use of Perl | unrated |
| use of Ruby | unrated |
| use of Lisp | unrated |
| use of Java | unrated |
| use of C# |
|
| use of Objective-C | unrated |
| use of C | unrated |
| use of C++ | unrated |
| use of PHP | unrated |
| use of ASP | unrated |
| use of legacy languages | unrated |
i3 Solutions
-
average score:
- type of organization: private
- size: small (11 to 50 people)
- website: www.i3solutions.com
- development offices:
This is a small consulting firm. Most developers are working at the Sterling headquarters office but some are working on clients' sites.
1 rating
Rate this employer!-
Mediocre
posted
on
February 27, 2007
This company would be better if it were a bit larger. As a developer, you will work with cutting-edge technologies (.NET 2.0, SharePoint 2007, etc.), but most projects are so short that it is hard to get in-depth experience in anything. Since the company is so small, its management has a habit of shuffling people every week or two from project to project. This can be cool for some developers but tiring for others. Also, they have a trend of assigning tasks to more...